Same Experts. New Name.
SeQuel Response and FM Engage are now Franklin Madison Direct. While our name has changed, everything else remains the same: our people, our process, and our passion for driving measurable results through direct marketing.
Blog
As a marketer, you’ve likely heard that you should send a piece of direct mail to the same audience three times, with 21 days in between each drop for the highest response rates. Contrary to this popular rule of thumb, there is no one-size-fits-all formula for a successful direct mail campaign.
The optimal direct mail frequency is unique to each direct mail strategy, brand, product, and market. Testing is the best way to discover how many target audience touchpoints produce the best results for your direct mail campaigns.
When planning a direct mail campaign, reach and frequency are two essential aspects that shape your strategy:
Finding the right balance between reach and frequency is key. A broader reach helps you expand awareness, while increased frequency can improve response rates and reinforce your message over time.
The first step in determining how often to send a mail campaign to your audience is considering your direct mail marketing campaign objective, the budget, and the overall market to build your testing strategy.
According to our Direct Mail Industry Benchmark Report, over 80% of consumers say receiving four or more direct mail pieces from a single brand in a year is excessive. Only 17% of respondents stated that two to three pieces are too many, making that a great starting point for brands new to the channel.
Industry best practices emphasize the importance of multiple audience touchpoints in direct mail advertising. This approach helps build brand awareness while driving both new customer acquisition and existing customer retention. An example of this would be a home warranty brand mailing policyholder renewal requests and following up for continued coverage.
But, an e-commerce brand using direct mail efforts to find scale via mass customer acquisition should enter the channel with one touch. Then following the matchback period, introduce re-mailing to increase gross sales from that target audience and maximize ROI.
The Medicare and insurance market is more crowded and competitive. Therefore, this type of brand may consider launching with a multi-touch approach to stay in front of the prospect and stand out from the competition. Pre-printing all of the touchpoints at once is also more cost-effective and helps to offset initial direct mail costs.
It’s also common for more expensive products with a higher CPA tolerance to mail at a higher frequency because they can afford the channel’s initial investment. That said, each brand’s goals are different, and it’s important to decide if your focus for the investment is to settle on the optimal ROI, or garner the greatest volume of new sales or new customers.
Like any marketing test, direct mail testing starts with a control group to measure performance. The control group receives the bulk of your mail volume, guided by either past learnings or industry best practices for first-time mailers.
To ensure your test is valid, you should only adjust one variable at a time. For frequency testing, that means your test groups should have the same:
The only change should be mailing cadence.
Budget also plays a key role in testing outcomes. If your goal is to achieve statistical significance, you’ll need a larger budget to create viable sample sizes. As the saying goes, “more data = more confidence,” but more data also requires more spend.
For marketers with tighter budgets—or those using automated platforms—directional results are often the first step. While not statistically significant, these insights can guide larger campaigns over time. The choice ultimately depends on how quickly you want to generate reliable learnings and optimize your strategy.
Once you’ve established the right mailing frequency, the next step is to test your creative strategy at each touchpoint. This helps determine whether sending the same piece multiple times reinforces your message, or if introducing different mailers at each touch drives stronger engagement.
Creative testing allows you to identify which value proposition resonates most with your audience. For example, if three touches prove to be the optimal cadence, you can hold your frequency, offer, list source, and digital integrations constant while introducing a new creative element.
Pairing frequency with digital marketing channels can create a stronger lift. If you know you’ll be mailing the same audience multiple times, layering in digital components like display ads, social media impressions, or email marketing can “preheat” the audience and drive stronger response compared to a mail-only approach.
Frequency also varies by audience type. A lapsed customer may not require as many touchpoints as a new prospect, since they already have some brand familiarity. Even if your data suggests one cadence performs best, it’s worth testing frequency across different segments to validate and optimize performance.
Frequency can drive results outside of new customer acquisition. For instance:
Whether you’re a seasoned mailer or just getting started, testing frequency can be integral to the success of a direct mail campaign. You won’t know if your audience enjoys the long game with multiple touches or prefers you keep it short and sweet with one piece of mail unless you commit to a thoughtful testing strategy. If you’re looking for a mailing services agency partner who can help, get in touch with Franklin Madison Direct today.